Translate

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Chapter 3: Pastor, Preach for Church-Wide Impact


Pastor, do you expect lives to be transformed when you preach the Word of God? How many lives? Do you anticipate individual transformation or congregational transformation? Probably both. But do you target the latter? The deliberateness of your community-focus will set the trajectory of sermon-listening within the church. William Thompson explains, “One would certainly not want to downplay or eliminate the personal nature of Christian experience; neither would one make it the totality of Christian experience. Preaching is always helping to enhance or downgrade community, whether it intends to do so or not.”[1] Has your preaching been directed at the entire flock of God under your care, or just to individual sheep? Have you proactively promoted community sermon-listening?

Usually, it is more encouraging to gauge the spiritual growth of select individuals in the church than to measure church-wide growth. If you only hear the positive responses from those who are excited about your sermons—those who are growing in Christ and are constantly giving you good feedback—then you will more regularly be satisfied with the fruit of your ministry. As a result, many preachers tend not to reflect on church-wide impact because it’s often not as encouraging as individual impact—or at least, it’s harder to measure. Ignorance can be bliss.

John Stott comments:
Low expectations become self-fulfilling. Where little is expected from sermons, little is received. Many moderns have never been taught to expect sermons to matter much, and so their habit at sermon time is to relax, settle back, and wait to see if anything the preacher says will catch their interest. Most of today’s congregations and preachers seem to be at one in neither asking nor anticipating that God will come to meet his people in the preaching.[2]

Preachers with low expectations find themselves preaching toward individual-change rather than communitywide-change. Instead of risking the disappointment of a non-congregation-wide response to the preached Word of God, they preach their sermons calling only for individual responses. Subsequently, they overlook the community-aspect of many New Testament passages. Don’t allow yourself to do this. Remember the second person plural imperatives and plural pronouns in the Bible. Explain the corporate nature of sanctification when the Bible calls for it. Yes, community-oriented application is harder to foster, but when it’s in the text, you need to faithfully communicate its intent.

When you conclude your sermon in prayer, pray for a church-wide response. Even when the sermon application is directed at individual Christians, pray that the church will work together to make the necessary steps toward Christlikeness. Then call the church to discuss the implications of the sermon immediately after the sermon. This is what partnership is all about. Normally, the church family will engage in conversation after the service, so prime them with discussion points. These can guide their fellowship over tea and coffee (or whatever follows the service).

As you call for church-wide transformation, be compassionate towards the people. Call the flock of God to obedience, expressing your love for them. Their struggle against sin is just as difficult as yours. Lloyd-Jones taught:
To love preaching is one thing, to love those to whom we preach is quite another. The trouble with some of us is that we love preaching, but we are not always careful to make sure that we love the people to whom we are actually preaching. If you lack this element of compassion for the people you will also lack the pathos which is a very vital element in all true preaching.[3]

May Samuel Chadwick’s love for preaching encourage you to continue this most important role:
I would rather preach than do anything else in the world. I would rather preach than eat my dinner or have a holiday. I would rather pay to preach than be paid not to preach. It has its price in agony and sweat and tears, and no calling has such joys and heartbreaks, but it is a calling an archangel might covet. Is there any joy like that of saving a soul? Any thrill like that of opening blind eyes?[4]





[1] William D. Thompson, Listening on Sunday for Sharing on Monday (Valley Forge, PA: Judson Press, 1983), 31.
[2] J. I. Packer in Dick Lucas, Preaching the Living Word: Addresses from the Evangelical Ministry Assembly (Geanies House, Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications, 1999), 32–33.
[3] D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Preaching and Preachers (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing, 1971), 92.
[4] Archibald Naismith, 2400 Outlines, Notes, Quotes, and Anecdotes for Sermons (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1967), 184.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Chapter 2: Pastor, Preach with a Plan


Important endeavors require preparation. Preachers need to plan ahead in order to help the church family take full advantage of the sermon-event. This is especially true when community-oriented sermon-listening is practiced. Your goal is to change the sermon-listening culture of the church. So, the details of that change need to be well planned.

Pastor, the first thing you can do promote community-anticipation for the weekly sermon is to publish the sermon topic and passage ahead of time. You can post the sermon title and Bible text on the church website. You can have the church office e-mail the sermon information to the congregation. It can also go into the church bulletin a week ahead of time. But frankly, just sending out a passage reference is not enough. You need to do more than that to generate interest in the upcoming message.

Try asking the congregation questions that the Bible passage will answer in your sermon. Get them wondering about issues that are addressed in the text. Consider the way you typically garner the congregation’s interest in your sermon introductions, and employ the same techniques to write questions that will pique the church’s interest even before they gather to hear the sermon. In addition to using the church website and e-mail contact list, you could also post your thoughts on Facebook or Twitter. If you have video recording capability (a smart phone will do), you could deliver your questions in person via a two-minute video message that could easily be uploaded to YouTube. The church will value that personal touch. It is another way to maintain contact with the congregation during the week. The goal is to have the entire church preparing for the sermon together, asking questions about the passage, asking questions that relate to application, praying together, and anticipating personal and corporate transformation.

Second, you should encourage prayer groups to pray for you, the upcoming sermon, and the church’s response to it. Prayer groups can meet before, during, and after the sermon event. Donald Whitney recounts a story:
An American preacher once visited Spurgeon and was given a tour of the church building where he ministered, the Metropolitan Tabernacle. He noticed that there was no heat in the worship center, so he asked, “Don’t you have a heating plant?” Spurgeon responded by leading him down to a large basement room. In that room four hundred men met before each service to pray for the pastor and the salvation of souls. Spurgeon said, “That’s our heating plant.” He responded similarly in 1882 when some American visitors to the Tabernacle asked what was the secret of success: “My people pray for me.”[1]

No wonder thousands were converted under Spurgeon’s preaching ministry. If you want the same kind of fruit, the entire congregation must commit to faithful prayer, and you—the pastor—will need to encourage that, just as Paul did (2 Thess 3:1).

Michael Fabarez asks people in the church to pray for elements of his sermon preparation: Tuesday 8–11am, study of text; Tuesday 11am–noon, word studies; Thursday 1–5pm, commentaries; Friday 8am–noon, study significance; Friday 1–3pm, craft outline; Friday 3–4pm, prepare handouts; Saturday 8–9am, refine content; Saturday 9–10am, prepare illustrations; Saturday 10–11am, introduction and conclusion.[2] Each hour of his sermon preparation is covered in prayer by someone. This is one way to get the congregation involved in the sermon. They take ownership of the process and contribute to it.

Third, you can plan to have the entire worship service support the main theme of the sermon. Meet with your worship leader and discuss the next sermon series. If he knows what’s coming up, he may be able to select songs that contribute to the overall theme. This may be hard to achieve in some sections of Scripture, but more often than not, he’ll be able to select worship anthems that express concepts and ideas similar to that of the Bible text you’re preaching. Bible readings and other elements in the public worship service can also coordinate with the overall message. Careful planning with your worship team will bring harmonious expressions of worship that work in concert with each other, and will also prepare them to hear the sermon.

Next week, we’ll discuss preaching for church-wide impact.


[1] Donald S. Whitney, Spiritual Disciplines within the Church: Participating Fully in the Body of Christ (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 1996), 71–72.
[2] Michael Fabarez, Preaching That Changes Lives (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2002), Appendix 2.

Thursday, December 8, 2016

Chapter 1: Pastor, Preach Expositionally


Anything less than expository preaching is technically not really preaching at all.[1]
   A. Duane Litfin

Take a deep breath before you read this next sentence—it’s my working definition of expository preaching. Here we go: Having prepared his own soul, and having studied the historical background, context, words, structure, and syntax of a portion (or portions) of Scripture in order to discover the original author’s intended meaning, and filtering that meaning through a systematic theological grid to determine the timeless biblical truth, the preacher then authoritatively proclaims that timeless truth to his contemporary audience by implicating them with a full explanation of the text (or texts), drawing them to a steadfast conviction of that timeless truth, and fully expecting corresponding personal assimilation and Christ-exalting responses in today’s context. Whew! You can breathe again. Despite what some people say, expository preaching is not verse-by-verse commentary void of illustration and compelling argumentation. It’s not limited to a three-point outline. It’s not a lecture presenting pure scholarly exegesis void of passion and pastoral care. Neither is it a devotional or prayer meeting talk.

In his classic book on preaching, Between Two Worlds, John Stott dismisses a popular misnomer:
All true Christian preaching is expository preaching. Of course, if by an ‘expository’ sermon is meant a verse-by-verse explanation of a lengthy passage of Scripture, then indeed it is only one possible way of preaching, but this would be a misuse of the word. Properly speaking, ‘exposition’ has a much broader meaning. It refers to the content of the sermon (biblical truth) rather than its style (a running commentary). To expound Scripture is to bring out of the text what is there and expose it to view. The expositor prizes open what appears to be closed, makes plain what is obscure, unravels what is knotted and unfolds what is tightly packed. The opposite of exposition is ‘imposition,’ which is to impose on the text what is not there. But the ‘text’ in question could be a verse, or a sentence, or even a single word. It could equally be a paragraph, or a chapter, or a whole book. The size of the text is immaterial, so long as it is biblical. What matters is what we do with it. Whether it is long or short, our responsibility as expositors is to open it up in such a way that it speaks its message clearly, plainly, accurately, relevantly, without addition, subtraction or falsification. In expository preaching the biblical text is . . . a master which dictates and controls what is said.[2]

In other words, all preaching is to be expositional if it is indeed true preaching. If the sermon is not expositional, it doesn’t have the goal of exposing the biblical text for public viewing. If it doesn’t expose the text, it’s not from God. If it’s not from God, the preacher should be replaced by a man who will deliver exposition.

Paul commanded Timothy: “Give attention to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation and teaching” (1 Tim 4:13). Mark Dever contends: “A commitment to expositional preaching is a commitment to hear God’s Word.”[3] “Someone may happily profess that God’s Word is authoritative and that the Bible is inerrant. Yet if that person in practice (intentionally or not) does not preach expositionally, he denies his own claim.”[4]

Pastor, don’t read this blog looking for a shortcut to community sermon-listening. Your desire for church-wide impact (via community sermon-listening) starts with your dedication to expository preaching.

Lance Quinn asserts:
Expository preaching is and always has been God’s chief tool for producing growth in grace. Therefore, it deserves the closest attention. Though every Christian should read, study, and meditate on Scripture, God uses Bible exposition for the optimal enhancement of his spiritual growth. It is not overstating the case that preaching should be the chief means of dispensing strengthening grace in a believer’s life. Spiritual advancement, then, will hinge on how determined one is to assemble with other Christians when God’s Word is faithfully proclaimed.[5]

So important is the task of preaching that Mark Dever willingly admits, “I [am] happy to see every aspect of my public ministry fail if it [needs] to . . . except for the preaching of God’s Word.”[6] He knew he was “set apart by the congregation for the public teaching of God’s Word.”[7] Notice how Dever recognizes the church’s affirmation of this important task. If the church doesn’t also buy into this conviction, then the whole process of preaching will break down eventually. Pastor, you need to lead the congregation in this regard. Both you and your people need to be equally committed to the ministry of preaching God’s Word and you may need to teach them that. Preach on the subject of preaching. From time to time, you might include the following quotes in your church bulletin, or reference them in your sermons on the subject of preaching:

Word and worship belong indissolubly to each other. All worship is an intelligent and loving response to the revelation of God, because it is the adoration of His name. Therefore acceptable worship is impossible without preaching. For preaching is making known the Name of the Lord, and worship is praising the Name of the Lord made known. Far from being an alien intrusion into worship, the reading and preaching of the word are actually indispensable to it. The two cannot be divorced. Indeed, it is their unnatural divorce which accounts for the low level of so much contemporary worship. Our worship is poor because our knowledge of God is poor, and our knowledge of God is poor because our preaching is poor. But when the Word of God is expounded in its fullness, and the congregation begin to glimpse the glory of the living God, they bow down in solemn awe and joyful wonder before His throne. It is preaching which accomplishes this, the proclamation of the Word of God in the power of the Spirit of God. That is why preaching is unique and irreplaceable.[8]

One of the first steps to a recovery of authentic Christian preaching is to stop saying, “I prefer expository preaching.” Rather, we should define exactly what we mean when we say “preach.” What we mean is, very simply, reading the text and explaining it—reproving, rebuking, exhorting, and patiently teaching directly from the text of Scripture. If you are not doing that, then you are not preaching.[9]

Preaching is therefore always a matter of life and death. The people in our churches depend for their very lives on the ministry of the Word; therefore our preaching had better be nothing less—and nothing other—than the exposition of the Bible. Nothing else will do.[10]

Expository preaching is therefore inescapably bound to the serious work of exegesis. If the preacher is to explain the text, he must first study the text and devote the hours of study and research necessary to understand it.[11]

Tell your congregation you’re going to put away your “butter knives and plastic utensils.”[12] Tell them you’re going to wield something sharper than a two-edged sword. “For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Heb 4:12).

If you and your congregation are devoted to hearing God’s voice in the sermon event, you’ll all contend for its practice in the local church, and you’ll not be willing to replace it with trendy, ineffective substitutes.

Next week, we’ll see that in order to maximize the impact of your preaching ministry, you must not only be committed to exposition, but you must also be willing to make the necessary preparations.  Catch you next week for “Preach with a Plan.”




[1] A. Duane Litfin, “Theological Presuppositions and Preaching: An Evangelical Perspective” (Ph.D. diss., Purdue University, 1973), 169–170.
[2] John R. W. Stott, Between Two Worlds: The Art of Preaching in the Twentieth Century (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing, 1998), 125–26.
[3] Mark Dever, What Is a Healthy Church? (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2007), 64.
[4] Ibid., 65.
[5] Lance Quinn, “Epilogue: The Listener’s Responsibility,” in John MacArthur, Jr. and The Master’s Seminary Faculty, Rediscovering Expository Preaching (Dallas, TX: Word Publishing, 1992), 354.
[6] Mark Dever and Paul Alexander, The Deliberate Church: Building Your Ministry on the Gospel (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2005), 33.
[7] Ibid.
[8] John Stott, Between Two Worlds, 82–83.
[9] R. Albert Mohler, He Is Not Silent: Preaching in a Postmodern World (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2008), 52.
[10] Ibid., 63.
[11] Ibid., 66.
[12] A phrase coined by Steve Lawson in a sermon entitled The Preacher’s Invincible Weapon (Hebrews 4:12–13) preached March 7, 2008 at Shepherds’ Conference, Grace Community Church, Sun Valley, CA.

Monday, November 21, 2016

SECTION SIX: Sermon-Listening for the Preacher


Cricket—a precursor to American baseball—has been played in most Commonwealth countries since Tudor times in early sixteenth century England. Some historical accounts speculate that a game called creag, played by Prince Edward, son of Edward I (Longshanks) at Kent in 1301, was an early form of cricket.

For the past 160 years, the main version of the game has been the five-day match. Sadly, depending on the condition of the pitch, the weather, and the determination of the players, some games do not yield a result at the end of those five days—yes, you read that correctly—a draw! The five-day game is still played today.

While cricketing purists argue that the five-day game is cricket in the truest sense, more popular versions of the game have been developed over the last fifty years. In 1971, the one-day, limited-overs game was accepted as an internationally recognized sport and immediately saw commercial success. Modern crowds were unable to attend a five-day game but were willing to commit to six hours of cricket viewing. In addition, the shortened version was almost guaranteed to produce a result, rather than a draw. Then in 2007, an even shorter version of the game was introduced at the inaugural Twenty20 World Championship. In this most recent rendition of the game, both teams have twenty ‘overs’ (each ‘over’ consists of six bowls) to notch up as many runs as possible without being dismissed by the other team. Typically, a Twenty20 game goes for three hours and is often played under lights in the evening and attracts huge crowds. The new generation of cricketing enthusiasts loves the more exciting—edge-of-your-seat—version of the game.

Why change the game from five-day, to one-day, to three-hour matches? Market-driven trends, commercial viability, corporate business plans, statistics—these are the forces that drive sporting decisions in the modern age. Stadiums need to be filled in order to pay the bills. Games need to be exciting. Results must be guaranteed. Crowds must be appeased within a certain timeframe. The fans need to be entertained; else they fail to materialize on game day.

If you’re a pastor, you may have been tempted to think of the church and your sermons in the same way. There is much pressure to be ‘successful’ in ministry and success is measured by bodies, buildings, and budgets. Don’t fall for it. Some will tell you your sermons need to be shorter, lighter, and funnier. Some church leaders will tell you to eradicate the sermon altogether. But the church is not like the International Cricket Council (ICC). Market forces do not drive us. We have a higher calling. We have a game plan written by God Himself and we operate according to His instructions.

Preacher, my next series of blog posts assume that the biblical imperatives regarding preaching and fellowship are already a part of your convictions. If you’re not already convinced of the need for preaching in the church today, or the need for community life to be facilitated by that preaching, go back and read my previous posts at the links highlighted here.

This series of blog posts are for preachers who want to consider ways to maximize the impact of the Word of God upon the church. It suggests practical ways with which you can encourage church-wide preparation, congregational-listening, and community-oriented response to your sermons. Over the next weeks, return here for more on community sermon-listening for preachers.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Chapter 4: 12 Tips on How to Lead a Sermon-Based Small Group


If you’re not involved in a mid-week Bible study group, you should be. If your church is so large that it’s difficult to be involved in genuine Christian fellowship at the public gathering on Sunday, or if the Lord’s Day is so crowded with other ministry activities, then you need to find another way to accomplish this. Mid-week gatherings are the way to go.

Often the only way to facilitate body-life and community is to join a small group. Your small group should be made up of people from your church so that you’re all being impacted by the same biblical truths, and overseen by shepherds who all have the same basic biblical convictions. That doesn’t mean that you’ll agree on everything, but it does mean that you have the same foundational theological convictions and are all contending for the same faith. It makes no sense to be doing regular Bible studies with a Roman Catholic or a Mormon who preaches “a different gospel, which is really not another” (Gal 1:6–7), believing this constitutes Christian fellowship. It doesn’t.

Some study groups have an evangelistic purpose and that’s fine, but that’s not what I am describing here. I am referring to Christians meeting with Christians for mutual edification. I don’t wish to undermine the need for evangelistic pursuits and I encourage you to do all you can to expose the lost to the gospel by loving unbelievers and spending time with them just as Jesus did. But in order to do this effectively, you need to be sure you’re both hearing and acting on God’s Word yourself in the context of biblical fellowship. In fact, to the extent that you are living the gospel yourself, your gospel ministry will be invigorated and biblically enabled.

Regarding the necessity of being involved in small fellowship groups, C. J. Mahaney writes,
[God] will of course use teachers of the word through sermons, books, and tapes. But he will also use the regular guy in your small group—and there’s the rub. We can ignore teachers, close books, and turn off tapes. When we do pay attention, we can conveniently misapply teachings. But the people closest to us, if they’re doing their job in fellowship, are not likely to let us ignore God’s urgings so easily.[1]

Some mid-week small groups choose to focus on an area of study that’s different to the subject of the Sunday sermon. Many of these studies are helpful, aid Christian growth, and facilitate Christian fellowship, but they don’t maximize the impact of a church-wide focus that the Sunday sermon brings. Rather than allowing that corporate focus to come and go without significant effect, we should mold our mid-week small group ministry around the shared sermon experience. It’s better to have a singular spiritual focus that is actually being fleshed out in practical personal application, than to have multiple spiritual inputs that don’t have the opportunity to affect real change.

Pastor Larry Osborne of North Coast Church in northern San Diego County introduced the church to sermon-based small groups. He and his elders made the decision that this would be the main ministry focus which would be promoted to the entire church even at the expense of some other long-established ministries. As a result of their purposeful efforts, 80 percent of the average weekend adult attendance are involved in sermon-based small groups. Osborne soon noticed the following benefits: increased attentiveness during the sermon, increased note-taking during the sermon, spirited discussion after the sermon, single-minded church-wide focus, and Bible knowledge that extended beyond mere familiarity.[2]

At Faith Bible Church, we have several sermon-based study groups that meet on weekday evenings to discuss and apply the previous Sunday’s sermon. The effectiveness of these groups is proven. The people involved in these groups want to maximize the outcomes of the corporate sermon event. They’re not willing to let the experience come and go without reflection and prayer. They want to challenge one another to apply the truths of the preached passage. They want to pray for and encourage one another in the process. It’s been an effective way to build community and facilitate body-life.

Colin Marshall writes,
In a sermon, the whole congregation can be challenged to make application in certain areas. In small groups, however, each member can think through personal applications in more detail. Struggles in applying the Bible can be shared and there is time for prayer for each other. Small groups can provide a sense of accountability where members help each other act upon decisions to change.[3]

Of course, it’s important to not let these sermon-based study groups devolve into preacher-critiques. You’re not there to talk about the pastor or the pros and cons of his preaching style. Rather, you’re there to discuss God’s Word and its effect on your life.

I suggest the following tips for undertaking a sermon-based small group.[4]

First, plan ahead. Before meeting with your group, read your sermon notes and reflect on your personal points of application. Remember what questions you had and make mental notes of how you might contribute to your group’s discussion. Pray ahead of time, asking the Lord to make your study group the most profitable time of fellowship ever.

Second, agree to meet in comfortable surroundings that promote easy discussion. Sit in a circle rather than in a classroom format. Make sure each person can have eye-contact with everyone else. Start with tea and coffee. The informal atmosphere will break down the nervous feelings that those who are not accustomed to such settings invariably experience. Do everything you can to make people feel comfortable and at ease. As the group gets to know each other more intimately, this will happen naturally.

Third, encourage everyone to be prompt. Time is as valuable to many people as money. If the group runs late (because of a late start), these people will feel as robbed as if you had picked their pockets. So, unless you have a mutual agreement, begin and end on time.

Fourth, ensure the group size doesn’t grow beyond a number that makes personal interaction impossible. If people feel like there was no opportunity to contribute due to too many overly talkative people they’ll become frustrated and eventually leave. If there are too many silent moments created by the fact that there were not enough people present, the introverts will become quite uncomfortable and they’ll eventually leave too. Larry Osborne believes “the ideal size for a group of married couples is usually twelve to fourteen people. For singles, eight to twelve can be ideal. That’s because a group of six couples has a radically different dynamic than one with a dozen singles.”[5] Each group will be different, so you’ll need to evaluate from time to time to ensure discussions are going well and intimacy is actually happening.

Fifth, start the discussion by re-reading the sermon passage. This will orient the ensuing conversation around the text. Keep your Bibles open throughout the meeting so that your focus always returns back to the text whenever there is a transition in thought.

Sixth, involve everyone. Group learning works best if everyone participates more or less equally. If you’re a natural talker, pause before you enter the conversation. Maybe you could ask others what they think. If you’re a natural listener, try to contribute more to the discussion. Introverts are typically satisfied to go home having been ministered to, but need to learn that they also have much to contribute to the lives of others. No one person should dominate the session, so be careful to measure your contribution after each meeting and adjust next time if necessary.

Seventh, make sure the church leaders appoint or affirm a leader for your group. The leader must be apt to teach but mustn’t see his role as the sole teacher in this particular setting. Instead, he’s to facilitate group learning. The leader should help group members to make their own discoveries. If you’re the leader, ask the folk:
·      What personally challenged you in the sermon?
·      What are areas of agreement or disagreement?
·      What questions did the sermon leave unanswered?
·      What new thoughts about God or the gospel were impactful?
·      What areas of change do you/we need to implement now?
·      What hindrances to personal change do you foresee?
·      How can we pray for one another in these things?

Everyone needs to understand that there are no silly questions. Each person should feel secure to share, and the leader will need to work toward this kind of openness in the group.

Eighth, there’s a lot to accomplish, so the leader (and the group) will need to pace the discussion to get through as much as possible. The areas of discussion should include observations of the Bible passage, interpretation, church-wide implications, personal application, specific changes that each person will make in their thinking and/or actions, and prayer for one another. Theology and Bible interpretation are important, but do not get so bogged down in these early discussions that you run out of time later. Remember the whole point of the small group is to ‘get personal’ about Christian living.

It’s far better to have people leave the meeting wishing it’d been longer, than to have them leave wishing it’d been shorter. If people believe there was so much more ground to cover in the meeting but feel that it wasn’t achieved, then their fellowship will continue in personal relationships throughout the week. This is a good thing. The study group has achieved its purpose—namely, to promote spiritual partnership beyond mere attendance.

Ninth, finish the sermon-based discussion by offering at least one prayer request each. The request can be about anything, but it’s best if it has originated from the discussion itself. Then pray for one another.

Tenth, the last five minutes of the meeting should be used to preview the next Sunday sermon. Read the upcoming passage and encourage people to attend Sunday services so they can be ready to contribute at the next small group meeting. Make sure you end on time so that those who have arranged for babysitters can get home to relieve the sitter as planned. If others want to stay longer and the host agrees, offer more refreshments and encourage further interaction.

Eleventh, commit to take breaks over the summer period and for other public holidays. This helps people to plan for other activities and not feel guilty that they are abandoning the group. It also helps them to see what it’s like to remove regular weekly fellowship from the sermon experience. They’ll come back excited to re-engage with the family of God because they now understand its value for themselves and for others.

Lastly, how do you know if your sermon-based small group is serving its purpose? The measure of its success is faithful attendance—but only in part. The goal is certainly not to have people pass a group quiz at the end of each sermon series. Similarly, motivating greater evangelistic effort, committing to deeper theological studies, shepherding the flock, and developing future leaders are excellent results, but these are not the primary goals of small fellowship groups. Instead we need to measure the quality of Christian relationships. Are the group members loving one another? Are they serving one another? Are they both giving and receiving significant spiritual input to and from those around them? Larry Osborne says, “I look for stories of mortgages and rents being paid, meals provided, hospital visits, holidays and vacations spent together, encouragement, and tough confrontations. All in all, the same stuff I’d look for in a healthy extended family.”[6] We hope to see the kind of fellowship that existed in Acts 2 where both spiritual and physical needs were being met by loving church members. Osborne adds, “The best way to see the most people grow deeper in their walk with God is . . . by having lots of folks tightly velcroed to other Christians and the Scriptures for the long haul.”[7] Sermon-based study groups are one of the best ways to maximize both.



[1] C. J. Mahaney, Why Small Groups? Together toward Maturity (Gaithersburg, MD: Sovereign Grace Ministries, 1996), 21.
[2] Larry W. Osborne, Sticky Church (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing, 2008), 60–63.
[3] Colin Marshall, Growth Groups: A Training Course in How to Lead Small Groups (Kingsford, N.S.W.: Matthias Media, 1995), 21.
[4] These suggestions are derived in part from John MacArthur, Jr., The Body Dynamic (Colorado Springs, CO: Chariot Victor Publishing, 1996), 135–36.
[5] Larry Osborne, Sticky Church, 77.
[6] Ibid., 106.
[7] Ibid.