I once visited a church that had operated a parking-lot worship service for years. So-called “attendees” watched the church service from the comfort of their own vehicles. They drove up to a large drive-in movie screen and tuned their car radios to the church frequency. The service they viewed was a live projection of what was happening inside the church building. This was “church” for them. And the people inside the church walls were well pleased to provide the service. Essentially, the parking-lot Christians were saying to themselves, “We like the church (namely, the service) but we do not like the church (namely, the people).” And the pew-sitting Christians inside the church walls were saying, “Yeah, that’s fine. We don’t need you in here anyway!”
This picture illustrates a problem that
existed in the Corinthian church in AD 55. No, they weren’t operating a
drive-in ministry—it was a different problem. The Apostle Paul discovered the
difficulty while ministering in Ephesus when a secret report came to him from
Chloe’s people (1 Cor 1:11). Several issues had divided the Corinthian church.
In chapter twelve of his first letter, Paul focused specifically on one
spiritual wedge which brought further separation to a church already
divided—namely, the misuse of spiritual gifts.
Paul describes two groups in the church—the
‘arrogant independents’ and the ‘falsely-humble enviers.’ The ‘arrogant
independents’ were content to operate in the church on center stage without
assistance from anyone with a seemingly weaker spiritual gift or anyone who
didn’t measure up to their spiritual prowess. The ‘falsely-humble enviers’
sidelined themselves in the church because they didn’t have the publicly
noticeable spiritual gifts. Since they couldn’t compete with the more publicly
gifted ‘arrogants’ they selfishly removed themselves from all church
activities.
To the ‘arrogant independents,’ Paul
writes,
But now
there are many members, but one body. And the eye cannot say to the hand,
"I have no need of you"; or again the head to the feet, "I have
no need of you." On the contrary, it is much truer that the members of the
body which seem to be weaker are necessary (1 Cor 12:20–22).
And to the ‘falsely-humble enviers,’ he
writes,
For the body
is not one member, but many. If the foot should say, "Because I am not a
hand, I am not a part of the
body," it is not for this reason any the less a part of the body. And if the ear should say, "Because I am
not an eye, I am not a part of the
body," it is not for this reason any the less a part of the body. If the whole body were an eye, where would the
hearing be? If the whole were hearing, where would the sense of smell be? But
now God has placed the members, each one of them, in the body, just as He
desired. And if they were all one member, where would the body be? (1 Cor 12:14–19).
Paul uses the analogy of a human body to
show that all the members of the body are needed. No member can remove another.
Nor can a member remove himself or herself. John MacArthur explains:
In a normal, healthy human body, all the parts work together. If
they don’t, that body is disabled, unable to function normally. No single part
functions independently of the rest. So it is also in the body of Christ. All
the members must work together if the body is to function normally. And no
member was meant to function in isolation from the rest of the body; the New
Testament knew nothing of Christians who weren’t part of a local assembly.[1]
In 1 Corinthians 12, Paul wanted the
‘arrogant independents’ to be able to say to the seemingly less-gifted people
in the church, “I need you. You can’t sit on the sideline. You need to do your
part,” with a truly appreciative heart. And he wanted the ‘falsely-humble
enviers’ to be able to say to the seemingly more-gifted people in the church,
“You need me. I know my spiritual gift is important to the body. I want to
serve faithfully,” with a truly humble heart. Only by loving and appreciating
the input each person has to give to the life of the body, will either party
experience corporate and individual spiritual growth.
Likewise, today we ought also be able to
say to one another, “I need you and you need me.” This is true for the preacher
and the listener. Neither can make it without the other. I am not referring to
the simple issue of conducting a church service where a preacher and listeners
are required to be present to make it possible—I am referring to the
sanctification of both the preacher and the listeners. Their spiritual gifts
may be very different to each other; the visibility of their functions may be
more or less noticeable than the other; the honor and thanks received from
other Christians may be more or less given; but in the end, they both need each
other. The fellowship that takes place between the preacher and his listeners
is vital.
If a preacher with a more publicly-seen
spiritual teaching-gift were ever to say to his congregation, “I don’t need you
folks to be here at church. You may all sit in the parking lot if you wish. You
may watch me preach on a DVD or on live video feed from your own home if you
wish. You may observe my ministry from a distance if you prefer,” that would be
the height of arrogance, because that preacher would be revealing a heart of
independence in which he believes he doesn’t need those people and their
spiritual gifts to input into his life. I am not at all saying that this is
what all preachers have communicated when they started their online audio
sermon catalogues, began to make DVDs of their sermons, decided to go
multi-site, developed a virtual church website, or broadcasted their sermons to
people at a distance—the motivation for such developments is theirs alone to
evaluate since it is quite possible to utilize new technologies to great effect
with perfectly right motives. But the principle that says, ‘preachers need
listeners in their lives’ and ‘listeners need preachers in their lives’ still
applies. Preaching and fellowship go hand in hand. According to Paul Tripp,
“Personal spiritual insight is the product of community. It’s very difficult to
get it by yourself. . . . Every pastor needs people in his life in order to see
himself with biblical accuracy.”[2]
Pastor, you need people of differing gifts
and abilities around you to balance you and minister to you. Larry Osborne
sounds a warning to the self-serving church member:
If you’re an eye, you’ll start to devalue the ears as ancillary and
second-class appendages because they can’t see anything. You’ll attend some
special vision conferences where you’ll gather with other eyes to celebrate the
beauty of sight, learn new ways to sharpen your vision, and listen to guest
eyes bemoan the terrible blindness that ails the rest of the body. Eventually
you’ll join a vision-focused church where you can study the latest in biblical
optometry and congratulate yourself for your clarity of vision in a world gone
blind—all the while hardly noticing that you and your eye friends can no longer
do much besides see. You have no feet for walking, no mouth for talking, and no
ears to hear anything but your own thoughts.[3]
Conversely, if a church attendee said to his
or her pastor, “Since I can’t preach, since I can’t serve to the same extent as
others serve in the church, and since I am missing out on the public acclaim
you’re receiving, I’m going to stay at home and pursue my own spirituality. I
don’t mind being absent when you preach. I might listen to you sometimes
online. I might listen to other preachers depending on how I feel,” that would
be the height of spiritual individualism driven by spite and envy. Again, that’s
not what motivates all church leavers since some church departures are
biblically justified. But the principle that says, ‘preachers need listeners in
their lives’ and ‘listeners need preachers in their lives’ applies still.
Larry Osborne quips, “It may not always be
easy to be a foot in a world of hands. But if God has made you to be a foot in
the body of Christ, don’t try to be a hand. Granted, the hands might not think
all that highly of you and what you do. But trust me, they’ll never go very far
without you.”[4]
In addition, sermon-listeners need the
personal input and fellowship of other sermon-listeners. We each have unique
spiritual gifts assigned to us by God in order that we would serve and care for
one another (1 Cor 12:18, 24–25).
Are you able to say to the people in your church, “I need you (no matter what your spiritual gift is) and you need me (no matter what my spiritual gift is)?” Let’s acknowledge that preachers and listeners need each other’s fellowship and spiritual stimulation. Let’s also acknowledge that listeners need the fellowship of other listeners. The principle applies across the wide spectrum of gifted-individuals in any church. We all need one another. Far be it for any one of us to opt out of this divinely created organism—the church.
Far be it for any one of us to only do our sermon-listening alone.
Are you able to say to the people in your church, “I need you (no matter what your spiritual gift is) and you need me (no matter what my spiritual gift is)?” Let’s acknowledge that preachers and listeners need each other’s fellowship and spiritual stimulation. Let’s also acknowledge that listeners need the fellowship of other listeners. The principle applies across the wide spectrum of gifted-individuals in any church. We all need one another. Far be it for any one of us to opt out of this divinely created organism—the church.
Far be it for any one of us to only do our sermon-listening alone.
[1] John MacArthur, The Keys to Spiritual Growth: Unlocking the
Riches of God (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2001), 160.
[2] Paul David Tripp, Dangerous
Calling: Confronting the Unique Challenges of Pastoral Ministry (Wheaton,
IL: Crossway Books, 2012), 73.
[3] Larry W. Osborne, Accidental
Pharisees: Avoiding Pride, Exclusivity, and the Other Dangers of Overzealous
Faith (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing, 2012), 164–65.
[4] Ibid., 169.
No comments:
Post a Comment